New Releases by Sam Harris

Volgens filosoof en neurowetenschapper Sam Harris kunnen we ons leven radicaal verbeteren en vereenvoudigen als we leren altijd de waarheid te spreken. Het leugentje om bestwil – ‘Nee joh, je ziet er helemaal niet dik uit in die jurk’ – maakt ons leven niet alleen nodeloos ingewikkeld maar ook oppervlakkiger.

È davvero sbagliato mentire? La risposta può sembrare scontata, ma non lo è. Pensiamo alle "bugie bianche", quelle verità che alteriamo per non ferire qualcuno a cui teniamo ("Sembro grassa con questo vestito?"). Oppure a casi estremi, quando una bugia potrebbe essere necessaria per sviare un assassino dalla sua preda o per rassicurare un malato preoccupato. Ebbene, anche in questi casi mentire potrebbe innescare una serie di effetti a cascata difficilmente prevedibili che rischiano di fare più male che bene. In questo libro scorrevole e stimolante, Sam Harris ricorre agli attrezzi del mestiere del filosofo per analizzare lucidamente questo dilemma morale e perora la causa di un approccio radicale all''onestà che non ammette eccezioni (o quasi).

A New York Times New and Noteworthy Book From the bestselling author of Waking Up and The End of Faith, an adaptation of his wildly popular, often controversial podcast “Sam Harris is the most intellectually courageous man I know, unafraid to speak truths out in the open where others keep those very same thoughts buried, fearful of the modish thought police. With his literate intelligence and fluency with words, he brings out the best in his guests, including those with whom he disagrees.” -- Richard Dawkins, author of The Selfish Gene “Civilization rests on a series of successful conversations.” —Sam Harris Sam Harris—neuroscientist, philosopher, and bestselling author—has been exploring some of the most important questions about the human mind, society, and current events on his podcast, Making Sense. With over one million downloads per episode, these discussions have clearly hit a nerve, frequently walking a tightrope where either host or guest—and sometimes both—lose their footing, but always in search of a greater understanding of the world in which we live. For Harris, honest conversation, no matter how difficult or controversial, represents the only path to moral and intellectual progress. This book includes a dozen of the best conversations from Making Sense, including talks with Daniel Kahneman, Timothy Snyder, Nick Bostrom, and Glenn Loury, on topics that range from the nature of consciousness and free will, to politics and extremism, to living ethically. Together they shine a light on what it means to “make sense” in the modern world.

When Theo Dalton was six years old, his hands were irreparably damaged in a horrific car accident that took his pregnant mother''s life. Six years later, during the sweltering summer of 1968 in rural Oklahoma, Theo meets Frank, a Native American outcast, and learns that he has the ability to heal through his disfigured hands.As he explores the extraordinary, Theo desperately attempts to remain an ordinary boy. But when word of his gift spreads, Theo is shunned by the church for doing "the devil''s work." He is immediately swept away by his Auntie Li, and into a world which ultimately threatens his life as he saves others''. Told from Theo''s perspective some fifty years later, it is through his work as a therapist with a broken woman that he musters the courage to relive the summer that haunts him.The Substance of All Things is the gripping, heart-wrenching, and often humorous tale of mentors and mothers and fathers, love and redemption, prophets and charlatans, miracles and faith.

Kommer vi någonsin att hitta svaret på de stora existentiella frågorna? Är vårt slutgiltiga öde att lämnas ensamma och förlora alla vi älskar? Är religion alltid problematisk? År 2007 filmades ett möte mellan Christopher Hitchens, Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, och Daniel Dennett. Dessa ”fyra ryttare”, som de kommit att kallas, diskuterade den kvällen den nya ateistiska rörelsen över ett antal cocktails. Resultatet blev en intellektuellt spänstig diskussion, där den moderna ateismen framträder i all sin färgglada variation. Filmklippet blev blixtsnabbt viralt på Youtube, och plötsligt hade de fyra ryttarna satt igång en ateistisk revolution. För första gången kommer det banbrytande samtalet i en tryckt version, ackompanjerad av nya essäer skrivna av de nu levande tänkarna och ett unikt förord av Stephen Fry.

In 2007, Christopher Hitchens, Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, and Daniel Dennett filmed a landmark discussion about modern atheism. The video went viral. Now in print for the first time, the transcript of their conversation is illuminated by new essays from three of the original participants and an introduction by Stephen Fry. At the dawn of the new atheist movement, the thinkers who became known as “the four horsemen,” the heralds of religion''s unraveling—Christopher Hitchens, Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, and Daniel Dennett—sat down together over cocktails. What followed was a rigorous, pathbreaking, and enthralling exchange, which has been viewed millions of times since it was first posted on YouTube. This is intellectual inquiry at its best: exhilarating, funny, and unpredictable, sincere and probing, reminding us just how varied and colorful the threads of modern atheism are. Here is the transcript of that conversation, in print for the first time, augmented by material from the living participants: Dawkins, Harris, and Dennett. These new essays, introduced by Stephen Fry, mark the evolution of their thinking and highlight particularly resonant aspects of this epic exchange. Each man contends with the most fundamental questions of human existence while challenging the others to articulate their own stance on God and religion, cultural criticism, spirituality, debate with people of faith, and the components of a truly ethical life. Praise for The Four Horsemen “This bracing exchange of ideas crackles with energy. It’s fascinating to watch four first-class minds explore a rugged intellectual terrain. . . . The text affords a different, more reflective way of processing the truly vital exchange of ideas. . . . I commend the book to those seeking an honest reckoning with their religion—and those curious about how the world looks from a rigorously naturalistic and atheistic point of view.”—Pittsburgh Post-Gazette “The full, electrifying transcript of the one and only conversation between the quartet of luminaries dubbed the ‘four horsemen’ of the New Atheism, which took place in Washington, D.C., in 2007. Among the vast range of ideas and questions they discuss: Is it ever possible to win a war of ideas? Is spirituality the preserve of the religious? And, are there any truths you would rather not know?”—The Bookseller (UK) (starred review)

¿Es peligrosa la religión? ¿Y la espiritualidad? ¿Solucionará la ciencia todos nuestros problemas? ¿Es arrogante ser ateo? ¿Es posible criticar una religión sin ofender a sus fieles? Cuando empezaba a despuntar el movimiento del nuevo ateísmo, los heraldos del ocaso religioso que acabarían siendo conocidos como los «Cuatro Jinetes» —Dawkins, Harris, Dennett y Hitchens— se reunieron para tomar una copa y a modo de experimento grabaron la conversación. Así surgió esta charla rompedora y apasionante que enseguida se hizo viral. Los cuatro intelectuales afrontan en ella las cuestiones fundamentales de la existencia y se animan mutuamente a expresar sin tapujos las propias posturas respecto a Dios y la religión. El debate atañe la crítica cultural, la espiritualidad sin religión, la discusión con los creyentes, las infinitas corrientes del ateísmo moderno y las claves para vivir de forma íntegra. La crítica ha dicho... «La transcripción completa y electrizante de la única conversación entre el cuarteto de grandes pensadores apodado como los ''Cuatro Jinetes'' del Nuevo Ateísmo». The Bookseller «Este libro nos permite escuchar a cuatro personas que han meditado y peleado con uñas y dientes sin perder ni un ápice de su ingenio, humor y proporcionalidad. Se te acelera el corazón». Stephen Fry «Emocionante... Desafiante... Para los que buscan un ajuste de cuentas honesto con su religión, y para aquellos que sientan curiosidad por saber cómo se ve el mundo desde un punto de vista rigurosamente naturalista y ateo». Pittsburgh Post-Gazette «Una ventana privilegiada a la mente de cuatro gigantes intelectuales que conversan apasionadamente sobre fe y razón, superstición y teoría». Booklist «Las palabras de Dawkins, Harris, Dennett y Hitchens —los herederos de Voltaire— son más necesarias que nunca». Matt Ridley «Un diálogo estimulante que atraerá a los lectores interesados en el ateísmo y la apologética». Publishers Weekly «Un clásico de nuestro tiempo... y de todos los tiempos. Debería estar en la biblioteca de todas las personas pensantes». Michael Shermer

"U vrijeme kad se Drugi svjetski rat pribli`avao kraju, Dede Keren i ja smo u~ili da ~itamo u Peterson {koli u ^ikagu. Nisam mogao ni da sanjam da }e se moja voljena ro|aka kad odraste, udati za ~ovjeka ~ije je djetinjstvo obilje`eno strahotama tog rata. Sem Heris je napisao pri~u o njegovom opstanku za ~itatelje koji nisu mnogo stariji od Dede i mene iz tih ~ika{kih godina. Sa Semovom knjigom zavr{ava se krug ispunjen ljubavlju, bolom, trijumfom, sje}anjem i lekcijom za budu}nost."Susan Stamberg, - Nacionalni radio''U dijeljenju tvog li~nog svjedo~enja, kao osoba koja je pre`ivjela holokaust, podario si budu}im generacijama mogu}nost da osjete li~nu vezu sa historijom. Hvala za tvoj nemjerljivi doprinos, za tvoju snagu i bogatstvo duha''.Stiven Spilberg, reditelj [indlerove liste"Semi, dijete koje je pre`ivjelo holokaust, je izuzetna pri~a o djetetu koje je spa{eno zahvaljuju}i upornosti njegove sestre i saradnji mnogih koji su `eljeli da spase makar i jedno dijete od namjere nacista da uni{te sve Jevreje. Ono {to daje pri~i izuzetan {arm je ~injenica da je u njoj sa~uvan glas djeteta, nevinost njegovih shvatanja, jednostavnost njegovih osje}anja, i stalni osje}aj opasnosti. Semi se ne pretvara da zna vi{e nego {to zna, ili vidi historiju u svoj svojoj kompleksnosti, nego je to vodi~ u svijet koji ~ak ni najsofisticiraniji odrasli ljudi ne mogu da shvate. Knjiga je ujedno i potresna i uticajna.Majkl Berenbaum, direktor Ameri~kog muzeja holokausta

Peut-on être musulman et en même temps adhérer sincèrement aux valeurs laïques, constitutives des démocraties modernes ? La conversation entre l''athée Sam Harris et le musulman modéré Maajid Nawaz montre que les réponses simples ne tiennent pas la route : ni celles qui excluent a priori que les musulmans puissent adopter des valeurs laïques, ni celles qui nient toute opposition entre les enseignements du Coran et la démocratie libérale. Au fil de l''histoire, la référence à l''islam a souvent justifié la violence, l''asservissement et l''intolérance. Pour les extrémistes d''aujourd''hui, c''est toujours le cas. Cependant, l''interprétation des textes qui conduit les fanatiques est souvent déficiente - qu''il s''agisse des devoirs des croyants ou de la place de la religion dans la vie sociale et politique. Quelles sont alors les raisons qui poussent tant de musulmans à approuver, voire à adopter, des positions extrémistes et intolérantes ? L''islam est-il imperméable à la réforme ? Si non, quels sont les obstacles majeurs que les musulmans contemporains ont à franchir ?

Tutti parlano dell’islam, ma pochi lo conoscono realmente. Se il terrorismo islamico riempie le cronache, non accade altrettanto per la ricerca delle sue cause e per le strategie per combatterlo. Anche un tema importante quale la compatibilità dell’islam con la democrazia, la laicità e i diritti dell’uomo è raramente preso in considerazione. È proprio per fare chiarezza su questioni così importanti che il “nuovo ateo” Sam Harris e il musulmano riformista Maajid Nawaz hanno deciso di avviare un dialogo senza reticenze. Ne è scaturito un libro che mostra come il confronto sia non solo possibile, ma addirittura indispensabile — se si vuol vivere in società pacifiche e tolleranti.

“A civil but honest dialogue...As illuminating as it is fascinating.” —Ayaan Hirsi Ali Is Islam a religion of peace or war? Is it amenable to reform? Why do so many Muslims seem to be drawn to extremism? And what do words like jihadism and fundamentalism really mean? In a world riven by misunderstanding and violence, Sam Harris—a famous atheist—and Maajid Nawaz—a former radical—demonstrate how two people with very different religious views can find common ground and invite you to join in an urgently needed conversation. “How refreshing to read an honest yet affectionate exchange between the Islamist-turned-liberal-Muslim Maajid Nawaz and the neuroscientist who advocates mindful atheism, Sam Harris...Their back-and-forth clarifies multiple confusions that plague the public conversation about Islam.” —Irshad Manji, New York Times Book Review “It is sadly uncommon, in any era, to find dialogue based on facts and reason—but even more rarely are Muslim and non-Muslim intellectuals able to maintain critical distance on broad questions about Islam. Which makes Islam and the Future of Tolerance something of a unicorn...Most conversations about religion are marked by the inability of either side to listen, but here, at last, is a proper debate.” —New Statesman

Um olhar racional sobre como funcionam os mecanismos da meditação e os benefícios que ela pode nos trazer. Além de filósofo da moral e célebre ateísta, Sam Harris é um praticante entusiasmado de meditação, tendo viajado o mundo para estudar com diversos gurus. Neste livro, ele concilia os dois aspectos de sua vida e comprova como a meditação e a prática contemplativa não têm como pré-requisito qualquer tipo de crença "mística" ou "espiritual"; pelo contrário, para ele a meditação provaria que esses conceitos não existem. Harris se vale de seu próprio envolvimento com a prática e de aspectos da neurociência e da filosofia para provar seu argumento. Em suma, um olhar detido sobre como funciona a meditação e como ela pode aliviar o stress, aproximar as pessoas e nos ajudar em batalhas cotidianas.

Ложь ― удивительный феномен. Это прекрасный многофункциоu00adнальный инструмент, владея которым можно избежать неприятностей, сохранить добрые отношения с близкими, выглядеть лучше в глазах окружающих. Причем успешно обманывать можно как других, так и себя. Так разве лгать плохо? Известный американский писатель, ученый и популяризатор науки Сэм Харрис препарирует знаменитый «несмертный» грех под микроскопом, выявляя его негативные стороны, и при помощи многочисленных примеров доказывает нам: ложь, даже самая маленькая, ― оружие страшной разрушительной силы. Под его ударами не устоят ни авторитет, ни многолетняя дружба, ни прочные отношения. Вы сами не заметите, как, увлекшись враньем, не сможете обходиться без него и потеряете самое дорогое ― доверие близких. Автор учит нас не попадаться лжи на крючок и убеждает, что открыто говорить правду гораздо выгоднее даже в самых сложных ситуациях.

The performer and first winner of Star Search presents a collection of essays about friendship, the celebrity life, and getting sober, exploring such subjects as growing up gay in America''s Bible belt and attending Liza Minnelli''s wedding.

For the millions of Americans who want spirituality without religion, Sam Harris’s latest New York Times bestseller is a guide to meditation as a rational practice informed by neuroscience and psychology. From Sam Harris, neuroscientist and author of numerous New York Times bestselling books, Waking Up is for the twenty percent of Americans who follow no religion but who suspect that important truths can be found in the experiences of such figures as Jesus, the Buddha, Lao Tzu, Rumi, and the other saints and sages of history. Throughout this book, Harris argues that there is more to understanding reality than science and secular culture generally allow, and that how we pay attention to the present moment largely determines the quality of our lives. Waking Up is part memoir and part exploration of the scientific underpinnings of spirituality. No other book marries contemplative wisdom and modern science in this way, and no author other than Sam Harris—a scientist, philosopher, and famous skeptic—could write it.

As it was in Anna Karenina, Madame Bovary, and Othello, so it is in life. Most forms of private vice and public evil are kindled and sustained by lies. Acts of adultery and other personal betrayals, financial fraud, government corruption—even murder and genocide—generally require an additional moral defect: a willingness to lie. In Lying, best-selling author and neuroscientist Sam Harris argues that we can radically simplify our lives and improve society by merely telling the truth in situations where others often lie. He focuses on "white" lies—those lies we tell for the purpose of sparing people discomfort—for these are the lies that most often tempt us. And they tend to be the only lies that good people tell while imagining that they are being good in the process.

Sam Harris é um dos líderes do movimento que prega o abandono da religião em nome da ciência: o Novo Ateísmo, também defendido com veemência por Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett e Christopher Hitchens. Em A paisagem moral, o autor pretende demolir de vez a benevolência com que muita gente - cientistas inclusive - aborda a religião, como se a ciência não tivesse o que opinar no plano moral. Segundo ele, a neurociência pode sim contribuir na busca pela maximização do bem-estar disseminado que define, em sua visão, o pensamento moral. O universo de decisões que podem ser tomadas é representado no livro por uma paisagem "cujos picos correspondem ao apogeu do bem-estar possível e cujos vales representam o mais profundo sofrimento". A ciência - em especial no que diz respeito ao funcionamento do cérebro - já pode em parte ajudar a determinar o relevo dessa paisagem e, à medida que o conhecimento avança, essa influência deverá se tornar cada vez mais concreta. Em capítulos que tratam de verdades morais, do bem e do mal, de crenças, de religião e do futuro da felicidade, Harris descreve resultados de estudos em neurociência que não só definem essa ideia de moral, mas também lançam luz sobre os equívocos e a irrelevância da religião; a seu ver, esta seria antes uma fonte de fanatismo e intolerância - uma argumentação mordaz que tem tudo para arrebatar seguidores e promover debates acalorados.