Best Selling Books by Elizabeth Bennett

Charley's in charge of his dad's restaurant for a few hours. He's just a little boy, so his dad has told him to keep the place closed. But a tourist comes along who looks so hot and tired. Surely serving one ice cream wouldn't hurt? But trouble ensues when a large group of tourists turn up - and no one can stop the ice cream machine from overflowing! A fantastic black and white activity book with entertaining narrative and excellent puzzles and games to solve.

Featuring the popular Disney animated series, Jake and the Never Land Pirates, this adventure-filled storybook comes with play coins and a “real” treasure map! In this storybook, based on the popular Disney Jr. animated series, Jake and the Never Land Pirates, kids will follow Jake and his friends on one of their exciting adventures. Cabby has a map that leads to a favorite picnic spot, but Captain Hook thinks it will lead to treasure!Play coins and a durable treasure map add to the interactivity and fun!

"Twinkle, twinkle, little star. This book will tell you all about stars" -- Cover verso.

The sustainable development agenda has long been linked with social justice, income equality, and workers' rights. This article argues that voluntary sustainability standards-setting organizations (VSSSOs) can contribute to these goals by requiring employers to pay living wages and actively support collective bargaining. Examining the content of 25 voluntary sustainability standards (VSS) set by 16 systematically selected VSSSOs, this study finds that only 32% of VSS mandate a living wage, and only 16% rigorously support collective bargaining. It argues that supporting national minimum wages is helpful but not sufficient, examines sources of downward pressure on VSS, identifies potential explanations for variation among standards, and briefly describes a new initiative promoting living wage standards. While VSS are not a silver bullet for sustainable development or wage equity, VSSSOs are overlooking a significant opportunity to be a transformative part of a broader solution.

Since 2005, a “chicken or egg” dilemma has dominated the discourse over the order in which United States missions in Afghanistan can succeed. Given the current U.S. foreign policy interests and strategies in Afghanistan, are the counternarcotics, counterterrorism and development missions best achieved simultaneously (the status quo) or sequentially? If sequentially, in what order should they be prioritized? To answer these questions, I first separate the tri-mission nexus (counternarcotics, counterterrorism, development) into three bi-mission nexuses (e.g., counternarcotics and development) and examine each pair by asking: 1) To what extent and in what ways do the two goals have a shared mission? 2) Is the success of one a necessary condition for the other to achieve its mission? 3) Is the success of one a sufficient condition for the other to achieve its mission? and 4) What positive or negative externalities or “crossfire” exist between goals? The first question contextualizes the bi-nexus. The second and third questions -- regarding necessary and sufficient conditions -- are asked in both “directions” and seek to understand the meaning of one operation's success for the other operation. The final question exposes the positive and negative externalities of each mission's operational strategies on the other's success. Next, I synthesize the bi-nexus data to generate a detailed description of the counternarcotics, counterterrorism, and development tri-nexus. My analysis of this nexus holds constant U.S. interests in Afghanistan and the strategies selected to meet phase recommendation.

Nine-year-old Minikin Snickasnee wishes she were not a witch's child.

A music education course for Primary grades.