Most Popular Books by David Wong

Daily Mornings with Jesus, an annual 365-day devotional, has been delighting devotional readers with daily entries that include a Scripture verse, a reflection on Jesus''s words, and a faith step that inspires and challenges. "I have told you this so that my joy may be in you and that your joy may be complete." (John 15:10) Spend the year following Jesus, reflecting on daily devotions that show us His unchanging love and faithfulness.In Mornings with Jesus 2022, you can read one all-new devotion each day that will encourage you to embrace Jesus''s love, to lay down your worries and be filled with joy, and to focus on Him as.

Since the announcement and establishment of the Oversight Board (OB) by the technology company Meta as an independent institution reviewing Facebook and Instagram''s content moderation decisions, the OB has been subjected to scholarly scrutiny ranging from praise to criticism. However, there is currently no overarching framework for understanding the OB''s various strengths and weaknesses. Consequently, this article analyses, organises, and supplements academic literature, news articles, and Meta and OB documents to understand the OB''s strengths and weaknesses and how it can be improved. Significant strengths include its ability to enhance the transparency of content moderation decisions and processes, to effect reform indirectly through policy recommendations, and its assertiveness in interpreting its jurisdiction and overruling Meta. Significant weaknesses include its limited jurisdiction, limited impact, Meta''s control over the OB''s precedent, and its lack of diversity. The analysis of a recent OB case in Ethiopia shows these strengths and weaknesses in practice. The OB''s relationship with Meta and governments will lead to challenges and opportunities shaping its future development. Reforms to the OB should improve the OB''s control over its precedent, apply OB precedent to currently disputed cases, and clarify the standards for invoking OB precedent. Finally, these reforms provide the foundation for an additional improvement to address the OB''s institutional weaknesses, by involving users in determining whether the OB''s precedent should be applied to decide current content moderation disputes.

About The Wínnie the Póoh Christmas Coloring Book: The coloring book is filled with many stunning iconic scenes and characters for kids and adults. For those who love Christmas Holiday coloring activity and Wínnie the Póoh, the book is another way to enjoy this great cartoon movie. This coloring book is so helpful to relax and relieve stress yourself or spend time with your friends and beloved ones. Get this copy now and enjoy the amazing adventure with bunch of different Illustrations. Book Features: * BOOK CONTENT: Unique designs to color. No repeated Illustrations for a worth-it coloring experience. * ONE-SIDED PRINTING: Each coloring page is on one sheet and don''t worry about bleed through. Perfect with your choice of coloring tools as Crayon, Gel Pens, Markers or Colored Pencils. * PREMIUM MATERIAL & BOOK SIZE: High quality pages with reasonable size of 8.5x11 inches. Neat and sturdy 90 GSM white pages with black ink designs that is perfect for your coloring needs. * MATTE COVER FINISH: Printed on 220 GSM white paper stock with original designs that created by talented graphic designers who have strong passion for exploring cultural diversities and art area to make outstanding products, they are giving all their love to every single detail. * 30-DAY HASSLE-FREE RETURN: If you have any issue as damaged or lost, please send the email that comes with the product for a REFUND with 30-Day Warranty. It is our intention to offer the best items and service on Amazon. Buy Now & Relax. Scroll to the top of the page and click the Add to Cart button.

DISCOVER THE STORY AND SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH OF AYOUNG MAN WHO SELF-HEALED FROM AN INCURABLEDISEASE THROUGH QI ENERGY TECHNOLOGY - EXPLOREHIS INVENTIONS, HIS INSPIRING TRANSFORMATION,AND HIS VISION FOR THE FUTURE?YOU''LL UNCOVER? The Qigong master who killed cancer cells from 3,000 miles awayThe little-known 5th force in physics, The advanced research on subtle (Qi) energy and its effects,The extraordinarily gifted students of superhuman schools across China, Amazing new frequency healing technologies (sound, light, magnetic waves, and beyond!)The bridge that connects science and spirituality? And SO MUCH MORE!Also discover new techniques and technologies for brain training, biohacking for anti-ageing, altered states and spiritual enlightenment

The "scope" of Pyrrhonian Skepticism refers to the extent to which Skeptics bear epistemic commitments. There are two respects in which the debate between unmitigated and mitigated interpretations of Skepticism is significant. First, there is the philosophical question of which version of Pyrrhonism is more coherent and compelling when considered on its own merits. Second, there is the historical question of which sort of interpretation accurately characterizes Pyrrhonism itself, as it is presented in the works of Sextus Empiricus. My own arguments proceed accordingly. On the philosophical front, I argue (primarily in Chapters 2 and 3) that when the force of the Skeptical modes is fully understood, they are unmitigated in scope. On the historical side, I argue (primarily in Chapters 1 and 4) that an unmitigated interpretation of Pyrrhonism is consistent with the Sextan corpus. Throughout, my ultimate aim is to present a vision of unmitigated skepticism that is, if not an expression of the historical reality of Pyrrhonism, at least a direct descendant of it. The central argument concerns the Five Modes of Agrippa, which are widely regarded as comprising the most powerful argument of Pyrrhonian Skepticism: the "Pyrrhonian Problematic." The intuitive force of the Problematic lies in its generality. It threatens to cast into doubt every claim that can be advanced on every subject. According to the standard interpretation, the Problematic achieves this by constituting a declarative argument that consists of appealing premises and the conclusion that epistemic justification is impossible. I argue that this interpretation fails to capture the intuitive force of the Problematic in two ways: First, it is a mistake to interpret the scope of the Problematic as being narrowly restricted to the concept of epistemic justification. Second, and more importantly, it is a mistake to assume that the Problematic is an argument in the first place. Understanding its full potential requires that we instead interpret the Problematic procedurally, as a set of instructions that the Skeptic implements in engaging dialectically with an interlocutor''s claims.

The original document contains color images.